python: libsmb_samba_internal vs. libsmb

Stefan Metzmacher metze at samba.org
Wed Jan 9 14:07:28 UTC 2019


Am 09.01.19 um 11:23 schrieb Volker Lendecke via samba-technical:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:08:25PM +1300, Tim Beale wrote:
>> How about the attached patch as a compromise? It renames the Python
>> bindings back to libsmb_samba_internal, which should make it obvious to
>> external consumers that it's not a stable API. And we just change how
>> the python module is imported, so that we still end up with nice-looking
>> samba-tool code.
>>
>> CI link: https://gitlab.com/catalyst-samba/samba/pipelines/42620501
> 
> RB+

Pushed and already landed in master.

metze


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20190109/80e847e8/signature.sig>


More information about the samba-technical mailing list