[PATCH] Fix string to integer conversion
swen
swen at linux.ibm.com
Tue Feb 26 13:24:07 UTC 2019
Hi Ralph
thanks for going through all this effort but ... I have a few comments
On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 13:55 +0100, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> > Yeah, I might be willing to cross that bridge. Let me go through
> > the
> > changes in the caller. Stay tuned...
>
> here's a branch with a few fixups:
>
> <
> https://git.samba.org/?p=slow/samba.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/strto_err
> >
>
> We also need a doxygen comment on the new functions that explain
> possible
> results and errors.
Ok, I will do that..
>
> For now I think we should just go with the integeroverflow and signed
> detection.
Why not adding the last one detecting the no-conversion patch ?
Now a few comments regarding the FIXUPS.
general:
Why do split all initializations at declaration time into two hunks ?
I don't see a reason for that.
diff --git a/source3/lib/messages_dgm.c b/source3/lib/messages_dgm.c
index 4836697..b233c68 100644 (file)
--- a/source3/lib/messages_dgm.c
+++ b/source3/lib/messages_dgm.c
@@ -1454,6 +1454,9 @@ static int messaging_dgm_read_unique(int fd,
uint64_t *punique)
buf[rw_ret] = '\0';
unique = strtoull_err(buf, &endptr, 10, &error);
+ if ((unique == 0) && (errno == EINVAL)) {
+ return EINVAL;
+ }
if (error != 0) {
return error;
}
This is not needed. Exactly the same happens without this addition.
diff --git a/source3/utils/pdbedit.c b/source3/utils/pdbedit.c
index 51db671..c80d541 100644 (file)
--- a/source3/utils/pdbedit.c
+++ b/source3/utils/pdbedit.c
@@ -599,14 +599,13 @@ static int set_user_info(const char *username,
const char *fullname,
if (strcmp(kickoff_time, "never") != 0) {
int error = 0;
- uint32_t num = strtoul_err(kickoff_time,
- &endptr,
- 10,
- &error);
+ uint32_t num;
+ num = strtoul_err(kickoff_time, &endptr, 10,
&error);
if ((endptr == kickoff_time) ||
(endptr[0] != '\0') ||
- (error != 0)) {
+ (error != 0))
+ {
fprintf(stderr, "Failed to parse
kickoff time\n");
return -1;
}
I'm pretty sure our coding guide says somehting else.
Ok, I guess there's no poijhnt in commenting all of them.
At the end of the day, if that makes you feel better about it,
I won't object.
How do we proceed from here ?
I have the full patchset ready (incl. the no-conversion patch) but
without your fixups.
Since you have it all together, I guess there's no need for me to send
it again, right ?
So please let me know what's next.
Thanks for your support in advance, really appreciated !!!
Cheers Swen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20190226/171218ee/signature.sig>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list