[PATCH] CTDB recovery lock fixes and more scary example setting (bug #13790)
martin at meltin.net
Wed Feb 20 03:40:50 UTC 2019
The motivation for this patch set is that someone who works a lot with
CTDB told me that the example setting in 4.9 isn't scary enough. It is
too easy for an admin to simply uncomment it in the installed example
configuration file and then struggle to understand the likely failure
mode (i.e. nodes other than the recovery master are able to take the
So, I'd like 4.10 to have a scarier default. :-)
So, why is it a patch set rather than a single patch?
* I really want an invalid recovery lock setting to cause a node to be
banned. This makes the misconfiguration more obvious.
* There was no test for the case where the recovery lock is explicitly
set to use a helper (as opposed to a lock file).
* The code that constructs the command-line arguments for the helper
Please review and maybe push...
peace & happiness,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 16893 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the samba-technical