samba_dnsupdate timeouts (was Re: [PATCH] python indent bugfix in dns_hub.py)
jra at samba.org
Tue Feb 5 11:05:07 UTC 2019
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:47:03AM +0100, Volker Lendecke via samba-technical wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:12:51AM +0100, Stefan Metzmacher via samba-technical wrote:
> > Am 05.02.19 um 08:44 schrieb Volker Lendecke:
> > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:21:58AM +0200, Isaac Boukris via samba-technical wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:28 AM Tim Beale <timbeale at catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Yeah, it looks like changing the process model was enough to push the CI
> > >>> runners over the edge fairly reliably.
> > >>
> > >> FYI, I just tried to rebase merge request !200 on master and
> > >> build_samba_ad_dc_2 failed on a somewhat different dns error:
> > >> https://gitlab.com/samba-team/devel/samba/-/jobs/156308654
> > >
> > > I'll work on a patchset to restore the pre-async-dns/dns_hub behaviour
> > > and remove the dns_hub again. We need to find a different way to
> > > approach async DNS and properly test it. The current approach has
> > > proven to be the wrong way.
> > This has nothing todo with dns_hub!
> > I guess Tim's patch (I just pushed) will make the pipeline more reliable
> > again.
> It worked before, it does not work after. What more proof do you need?
> We need to work nicely with other developers, so we can not break
> gitlab CI for others.
To quote Metze, "This has nothing todo with dns_hub!".
No one else agrees with you and Metze just pushed
something that will hopefully fix gitlab-ci.
This isn't a problem of your code. Just drop this please.
More information about the samba-technical