Close all old samba "3" bugzillas ?
jra at samba.org
Wed Mar 21 20:24:40 UTC 2018
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 09:18:50PM +0100, Björn Jacke wrote:
> On 21.03.2018 20:39, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > Sure - but IMHO we need a "BUG-IDLE" or "MORIBUND" bug state
> > which doesn't show up in a regular search, but is easy to
> > select for if required. Just not "CLOSED" then.
> due to my everyday work I think I'm one someone who does really a lot of
> bugzilla research and editing work, I never was cumbered by too many old
> bug reports, the oposite is the case, the old bug reports often are
> still helpful. Anyway, no matter if there is a need for a flag like
> BUG-IDLE or so, there IS already a way to do that wanted filtering of
> old bug reports. If you don't wanna see them just make the search in the
> "Samba 4.1 and newer" product and not in all bugzilla products. You can
> even add 4.0 or 3.6 if you feel like it, you can even save a
> preconfigured customized search in your personal preferences. For Samba
> 5.0 we might introduce again a new product to be able to filter samba 4
> bugs away once those versions got old one day.
Can we add such a preconfigured search so it's readily available
to all profiles without people having to define it ?
More information about the samba-technical