vfs_fruit bug in ACL get/set - [PATCH] attached.
jra at samba.org
Wed Mar 7 21:47:54 UTC 2018
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 09:53:13PM +0100, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 02:35:13PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 11:17:00PM +0100, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> > >
> > > I was thinking about moving setting *and* getting to a lower layer. Whichever
> > > layer ends up doing it, should be fixed to correctly filter of course. I'm just
> > > questioning whether keeping this in fruit is the right thing to do when we're
> > > starting to use this more broadly.
> > Well it's still pretty fruit-specific. For example,
> > I don't want the SMB2 unix extensions to return the
> > global_sid_Unix_NFS_Users or global_sid_Unix_NFS_Groups,
> > as that's info that the client shouldn't have (IMHO),
> > as it's already covered by the owner and group SIDs
> > in the ACL returned. My current prototype code for
> > SMB2 unix only returns global_sid_Unix_NFS_Mode.
> > I understand why they did it for NFS or fruit, but
> > I really want the SMB2 unix design to be cleaner
> > than that - and one of the mandates I set myself
> > was "No UID's/GID's" - only SIDs.
> what is the rationale? Why return the mode but not the uid/gid. Are we *sure*
> that no SMB2 POSIX extensions client will ever need this in the future?
Yes I'm sure.
SMB2 is designed around SIDs - built into all
ACL and ownership and in all the RPC calls and pipes
(LSA/SAMR etc.). So for POSIX you *have* to have a local-server
uid/gid to SID mapping in order to work at all.
Returning uids/gid to a client exposes that internal
mapping over the network to clients. This is duplicate
(and possibly incorrect) information. What if you decide
to change your SID -> uid/gid mapping and change the
uids on the server side. That can happen with company
splits/merges with overlapping uid spaces. If you've
exposed both SIDs (which you already have to do) as
well as uids/gids to the client, then you've got to change
this mapping on *all* clients too, rather than making a
The uid/gid <--> SID mapping needs to remain hidden
and server dependent. SIDs *only* on the wire, and
clients can store and depend on one user representation
and not have to cope with two. As I recall, that's why
NFSv4 uses only a string name format (although it's
broken in that I think it can be a numeric string :-).
But this isn't needed to review the specific patch
I sent (I think :-). That's only about preventing
round-tripping adding more and more extraneous
ACE entries into the ACL :-).
More information about the samba-technical