[PR PATCH] [Updated] samba-tool domain trust: fix trust compatibility to Windows Server 1709 and FreeIPA
metze at samba.org
Thu Mar 1 09:49:55 UTC 2018
Am 01.03.2018 um 10:41 schrieb Alexander Bokovoy:
> On to, 01 maalis 2018, Stefan Metzmacher via samba-technical wrote:
>> Am 01.03.2018 um 08:54 schrieb Alexander Bokovoy via samba-technical:
>>> On to, 01 maalis 2018, Stefan Metzmacher via samba-technical wrote:
>>>> Hi Alexander,
>>>>>> As we only use remote_netlogon_info.dc_unc can we
>>>>>> add get_netlogon_dc_unc() that falls back to netr_GetDcName()
>>>>>> against the remote dc.
>>>>>> That would also help if we try to implement trusts against
>>>>>> an NT4 style domain.
>>>>> Makes sense. Updated patches attached.
>>>> Thanks much better:-)!
>>>> Is that tested against FreeIPA?
>>> Not yet, in my plans for today as I'm trying to figure out what else we
>>> are missing in TDO salt principals.
>> The salt principal for the BLA$ user object is wrong.
>> dn: CN=bla.base,CN=System,DC=w4edom-l4,DC=base
>> securityIdentifier: S-1-5-21-4053568372-2049667917-3384589010
>> trustDirection: 3
>> trustPartner: bla.base
>> trustPosixOffset: -2147483648
>> trustType: 2
>> trustAttributes: 8
>> flatName: BLA
>> dn: CN=BLA$,CN=Users,DC=w4edom-l4,DC=base
>> userAccountControl: 2080
>> primaryGroupID: 513
>> objectSid: S-1-5-21-278041429-3399921908-1452754838-1597
>> accountExpires: 9223372036854775807
>> sAMAccountName: BLA$
>> sAMAccountType: 805306370
>> pwdLastSet: 131485652467995000
>> The salt stored by Windows in the package_PrimaryKerberosBlob
>> (within supplementalCredentials) seems to be
>> 'W4EDOM-L4.BASEkrbtgtBLA' for the above trust
>> and Samba stores 'W4EDOM-L4.BASEBLA$'.
> Yes, exactly. It doesn't affect Samba AD DC trying to contact Windows AD
> DC because KDC advertises salt and Samba always generates the key on the
> fly. However, it does affect SSSD on FreeIPA masters because in IPA case
> KDC has all keys pregenerated at the time Kerberos principals are
> created when trust is added and SSSD uses a keytab to authenticate as
> I have a patch that passes userAccountControl to
> smb_krb5_salt_principal() and it should fix the problem. The patch is
> against 4.7.
That looks good, can you prepare this for master and
add a test to demonstrate the SSSD behavior, so we don't
regress on this in future. I guess it's just using
BLA$@W4EDOM-L4.BASE as client and/or server principal?
>> trustAuthOutgoing/trustAuthIncoming is
>> 'W4EDOM-L4.BASEkrbtgtBLA.BASE', which we handle correct.
> Yep. Also pure Kerberos level cross-realm TGT works.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the samba-technical