[Patch v2 14/15] CIFS: Add support for direct I/O write
Tom Talpey
tom at talpey.com
Tue Jun 26 13:29:43 UTC 2018
On 6/26/2018 12:39 AM, Long Li wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [Patch v2 14/15] CIFS: Add support for direct I/O write
>>
>> On 5/30/2018 3:48 PM, Long Li wrote:
>>> From: Long Li <longli at microsoft.com>
>>>
>>> Implement the function for direct I/O write. It doesn't support AIO,
>>> which will be implemented in a follow up patch.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli at microsoft.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/cifs/cifsfs.h | 1 +
>>> fs/cifs/file.c | 165
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.h b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.h index
>>> 7fba9aa..e9c5103 100644
>>> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.h
>>> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.h
>>> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ extern ssize_t cifs_user_readv(struct kiocb *iocb,
>> struct iov_iter *to);
>>> extern ssize_t cifs_direct_readv(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to);
>>> extern ssize_t cifs_strict_readv(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to);
>>> extern ssize_t cifs_user_writev(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter
>>> *from);
>>> +extern ssize_t cifs_direct_writev(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter
>>> +*from);
>>> extern ssize_t cifs_strict_writev(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from);
>>> extern int cifs_lock(struct file *, int, struct file_lock *);
>>> extern int cifs_fsync(struct file *, loff_t, loff_t, int); diff
>>> --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c index e6e6f24..8c385b1 100644
>>> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
>>> @@ -2461,6 +2461,35 @@ cifs_uncached_writedata_release(struct kref
>>> *refcount)
>>>
>>> static void collect_uncached_write_data(struct cifs_aio_ctx *ctx);
>>>
>>> +static void cifs_direct_writedata_release(struct kref *refcount) {
>>> + int i;
>>> + struct cifs_writedata *wdata = container_of(refcount,
>>> + struct cifs_writedata, refcount);
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < wdata->nr_pages; i++)
>>> + put_page(wdata->pages[i]);
>>> +
>>> + cifs_writedata_release(refcount);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void cifs_direct_writev_complete(struct work_struct *work) {
>>> + struct cifs_writedata *wdata = container_of(work,
>>> + struct cifs_writedata, work);
>>> + struct inode *inode = d_inode(wdata->cfile->dentry);
>>> + struct cifsInodeInfo *cifsi = CIFS_I(inode);
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
>>> + cifs_update_eof(cifsi, wdata->offset, wdata->bytes);
>>> + if (cifsi->server_eof > inode->i_size)
>>> + i_size_write(inode, cifsi->server_eof);
>>> + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>>> +
>>> + complete(&wdata->done);
>>> + kref_put(&wdata->refcount, cifs_direct_writedata_release); }
>>> +
>>> static void
>>> cifs_uncached_writev_complete(struct work_struct *work)
>>> {
>>> @@ -2703,6 +2732,142 @@ static void collect_uncached_write_data(struct
>> cifs_aio_ctx *ctx)
>>> complete(&ctx->done);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +ssize_t cifs_direct_writev(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
>>> +{
>>> + struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
>>> + ssize_t total_written = 0;
>>> + struct cifsFileInfo *cfile;
>>> + struct cifs_tcon *tcon;
>>> + struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb;
>>> + struct TCP_Server_Info *server;
>>> + pid_t pid;
>>> + unsigned long nr_pages;
>>> + loff_t offset = iocb->ki_pos;
>>> + size_t len = iov_iter_count(from);
>>> + int rc;
>>> + struct cifs_writedata *wdata;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * iov_iter_get_pages_alloc doesn't work with ITER_KVEC.
>>> + * In this case, fall back to non-direct write function.
>>> + */
>>> + if (from->type & ITER_KVEC) {
>>> + cifs_dbg(FYI, "use non-direct cifs_user_writev for kvec
>> I/O\n");
>>> + return cifs_user_writev(iocb, from);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + rc = generic_write_checks(iocb, from);
>>> + if (rc <= 0)
>>> + return rc;
>>> +
>>> + cifs_sb = CIFS_FILE_SB(file);
>>> + cfile = file->private_data;
>>> + tcon = tlink_tcon(cfile->tlink);
>>> + server = tcon->ses->server;
>>> +
>>> + if (!server->ops->async_writev)
>>> + return -ENOSYS;
>>> +
>>> + if (cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_RWPIDFORWARD)
>>> + pid = cfile->pid;
>>> + else
>>> + pid = current->tgid;
>>> +
>>> + do {
>>> + unsigned int wsize, credits;
>>> + struct page **pagevec;
>>> + size_t start;
>>> + ssize_t cur_len;
>>> +
>>> + rc = server->ops->wait_mtu_credits(server, cifs_sb->wsize,
>>> + &wsize, &credits);
>>> + if (rc)
>>> + break;
>>> +
>>> + cur_len = iov_iter_get_pages_alloc(
>>> + from, &pagevec, wsize, &start);
>>> + if (cur_len < 0) {
>>> + cifs_dbg(VFS,
>>> + "direct_writev couldn't get user pages "
>>> + "(rc=%zd) iter type %d iov_offset %lu count"
>>> + " %lu\n",
>>> + cur_len, from->type,
>>> + from->iov_offset, from->count);
>>> + dump_stack();
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + if (cur_len < 0)
>>> + break;
>>
>> This cur_len < 0 test is redundant with the prior if(), delete.
>>> +
>>> + nr_pages = (cur_len + start + PAGE_SIZE - 1) / PAGE_SIZE;
>>
>> Am I misreading, or will this return be one more page than needed? If start
>> (the first byte offset) is > 0, nr_pages will already be one.
>> And if cur_len is 4KB, even if start is 0, nr_pages will be two.
>
> I think the calculation is correct, assuming cur_len > 0. (which should be the case if we reach here)
Err, cur_len could possibly be zero, the prior line only breaks the
loop if cur_len < 0.
> If cur_len is 4kb and start is 0, nr_pages will be 1.
Hmm, I guess. But again, it seems as if this page handling is all
being coded inline, in subtly different ways. I'm just concerned
about clarity and robustness. To me, if it's hard to review, it's
even harder to maintain.
Tom.
>
>>
>>> +
>>> + wdata = cifs_writedata_direct_alloc(pagevec,
>>> + cifs_direct_writev_complete);
>>> + if (!wdata) {
>>> + rc = -ENOMEM;
>>> + add_credits_and_wake_if(server, credits, 0);
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + wdata->nr_pages = nr_pages;
>>> + wdata->page_offset = start;
>>> + wdata->pagesz = PAGE_SIZE;
>>> + wdata->tailsz =
>>> + nr_pages > 1 ?
>>> + cur_len - (PAGE_SIZE - start) -
>>> + (nr_pages - 2) * PAGE_SIZE :
>>> + cur_len;
>>> +
>>> + wdata->sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL;
>>> + wdata->offset = (__u64)offset;
>>> + wdata->cfile = cifsFileInfo_get(cfile);
>>> + wdata->pid = pid;
>>> + wdata->bytes = cur_len;
>>> + wdata->credits = credits;
>>> +
>>> + rc = 0;
>>> + if (wdata->cfile->invalidHandle)
>>> + rc = cifs_reopen_file(wdata->cfile, false);
>>> +
>>> + if (!rc)
>>> + rc = server->ops->async_writev(wdata,
>>> + cifs_direct_writedata_release);
>>> +
>>> + if (rc) {
>>> + add_credits_and_wake_if(server, wdata->credits, 0);
>>> + kref_put(&wdata->refcount,
>>> + cifs_direct_writedata_release);
>>> + if (rc == -EAGAIN)
>>> + continue;
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>
>> Same comments as for previous patch re the if (rc) ladder, and the
>> break/continues both being better expressed as careful goto's.
>>
>>> +
>>> + wait_for_completion(&wdata->done);
>>> + if (wdata->result) {
>>> + rc = wdata->result;
>>> + kref_put(&wdata->refcount,
>>> + cifs_direct_writedata_release);
>>> + if (rc == -EAGAIN)
>>> + continue;
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + kref_put(&wdata->refcount, cifs_direct_writedata_release);
>>> +
>>> + iov_iter_advance(from, cur_len);
>>> + total_written += cur_len;
>>> + offset += cur_len;
>>> + len -= cur_len;
>>> + } while (len);
>>> +
>>> + if (unlikely(!total_written))
>>> + return rc;
>>> +
>>> + iocb->ki_pos += total_written;
>>> + return total_written;
>>> +
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> ssize_t cifs_user_writev(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
>>> {
>>> struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
>>>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list