[RFC] Performance improvements

[Jeremy Allison]

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 07:32:53PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 09:40:58AM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba-technical wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 02:29:15PM +0200, Swen Schillig via samba-technical wrote:
> > > 
> > > Besides, I thought the argument for NOT having patch-10 (tevent) is
> > > because of fair-scheduling via tevent. 
> > > Are you telling me now this cannot achieved via tevent ?
> > > So if tevent is just processing all immediate events without looking
> > > left or right, then what is the reason again for not having patch-10 ?
> > 
> > "immediate" events mean just that. When you schedule
> > an immediate event that's the next one that will be
> > invoked. tevent certainly processes all immediate
> > events "without looking left or right" (by which
> > I think you mean first :-) as that is by design.
> 
> fwiw: immediate vs signal. signal wins. :)

Oh, good point. Just checked the code and you're
right of course :-).