[PATCHES] heimdal: lib/krb5: do not fail set_config_files due to parse error

Stefan Metzmacher metze at samba.org
Tue Jun 19 21:54:43 UTC 2018

Am 19.06.2018 um 23:02 schrieb Andrew Bartlett via samba-technical:
> On Tue, 2018-06-19 at 11:50 -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba-technical
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 08:42:34PM +0200, Volker Lendecke via samba-technical wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 08:33:23PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy via samba-technical wrote:
>>>> I'm OK for removing it atm but going forward we cannot pretend such
>>>> configurations do not exist. For example, if someone wants to build
>>>> Samba AD on RHEL/CentOS using Heimdal but keeping the rest of the system
>>>> with MIT Kerberos, a default system krb5.conf is utilizing includedir to
>>>> implement crypto defaults.
>>>> In a sense, Volker's follow up patch is a better direction because it
>>>> supports includedir operation.
>>> The problem is -- there's more broken code around this. How is our
>>> policy right now wrt heimdal? Do we have to go through upstream and
>>> fix their code first, wait for a release and then port into our
>>> version? Or can we go into our copy and right away fix what's broken?
>> *Is* there a working upstream anymore ? If not, we need to maintain
>> ourselves.
> Yes, there is a active working upstream and both Metze and I have
> commit rights if for some reason patches get ignored.  It is (horror) a
> github project these days, and I do see discussion of pull requests
> from time to time. 

I'm not aware that I have commit right there...


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20180619/74704666/signature.sig>

More information about the samba-technical mailing list