Samba 4.10 or 5.0
douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz
Tue Jul 10 21:34:39 UTC 2018
On 10/07/18 19:22, Stefan Metzmacher via samba-technical wrote:
> So I'd propose with 5.0.
In reality this will mean two things:
1. We will get more publicity for 5.0 than we would have got for 4.10.
Even sites that theoretically know better (e.g. LWN) will fall for a
fancy version number.
2. A number of people will decide to stay with 4.9 until 5.x has
"stabilised". So we had better make 4.9 good.
Karolin wrote:> I think it's important change to leave the kind of
> merged status behind us.
and I think that is a good point.
And as for Martin's "what all the cool kids are doing" -- the radical
view that seems to be taking over is that version 5 + 1 would be 6.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the samba-technical