[PATCH] Initialize value of written in cli_splice_fallback
David Mulder
dmulder at suse.com
Tue Jul 3 13:57:23 UTC 2018
I agree this approach looks better.
rb+
On 07/03/2018 07:43 AM, Bailey Berro wrote:
> Thanks for taking a look. I think initializing to zero before the loop
> and incrementing during each iteration makes the most sense. Please
> let me know what you think.
>
> Bailey Berro | Software Engineer | baileyberro at google.com
> <mailto:baileyberro at google.com> | 310-433-2216
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 11:55 AM David Mulder <dmulder at suse.com
> <mailto:dmulder at suse.com>> wrote:
>
> Your insertion comes right after the while (remaining) block. We don't
> leave that block until remaining evaluates false (until it reaches 0).
> Your insertion sets written to initial_size - remaining (remaining ==
> 0). Wouldn't you simply set written to initial_size, since we don't
> leave the block until everything is written?
> Also, you used 2 spaces to indent your line. Please read README.Coding
> (you should use tabs in c files for indentation).
>
> On 06/26/2018 03:00 PM, Bailey Berro via samba-technical wrote:
> > This patch fixes an issue where cli_splice_fallback did not set
> the number
> > of bytes that are written, leading to splice returning uninitialized
> > memory.
> >
> > I just sent in my Samba Developer's Certificate of origin.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Bailey
> >
> > Bailey Berro | Software Engineer | baileyberro at google.com
> <mailto:baileyberro at google.com> | 310-433-2216
>
> --
> David Mulder
> SUSE Labs Software Engineer - Samba
> dmulder at suse.com <mailto:dmulder at suse.com>
> SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham
> Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
>
--
David Mulder
SUSE Labs Software Engineer - Samba
dmulder at suse.com
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list