Last 3 autobuilds have failed...
ab at samba.org
Fri Jan 12 09:39:11 UTC 2018
On pe, 12 tammi 2018, Andreas Schneider via samba-technical wrote:
> On Friday, 12 January 2018 09:04:33 CET Björn JACKE via samba-technical wrote:
> > On 2018-01-11 at 08:38 -0800 Jeremy Allison via samba-technical sent off:
> > > [2199(16318)/2230 at 3h40m54s]
> > > samba.blackbox.wbinfo(ad_member:local)(ad_member:local)
> > > UNEXPECTED(failure): samba.blackbox.wbinfo(ad_member:local).confirm
> > > output of wbinfo -i against ad_member(ad_member:local) REASON: Exception:
> > > Exception: expected
> > > 'ADDOMAIN/administrator:*:100000:100004:Administrator:/home/ADDOMAIN/Doma
> > > in Users/administr +ator:/bin/false' or
> > > 'ADDOMAIN/administrator:*:100000:100004::/home/ADDOMAIN/Domain
> > > Users/administrator:/bin/false' got 'ADDOMAIN/
> > > +administrator:*:100000:100004::/home/ADDOMAIN/domain
> > > users/administrator:/bin/false'
> > I also got that error a couple of times and it looks a bit frightening. If
> > the upper/lower case writing of of nss_winbind is eratic, this is calling
> > for a lot of trouble. Does anybody know what the error might be here? It
> > wouldn't be good if we ignore this error and it ends up a 4.8 regression
> > bug finally.
> Uppercase lowercase?
> There is "Administrator" missing after the forth colon! Could be related to
> the last substitute changes!
No, GECOS field can be empty -- the test actually says about it as it
expects either existing GECOS or empty one. However, path is including
lowercased 'domain users' group name but the test expects it intact.
/ Alexander Bokovoy
More information about the samba-technical