New flakey test samba.tests.samba_tool.visualize_drs.SambaToolVisualizeDrsTest.test_reps

[Stefan Metzmacher]

Am 12.01.2018 um 08:00 schrieb Andrew Bartlett:
> On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 07:39 +0100, Ralph Böhme wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 07:31:22PM +1300, Douglas Bagnall wrote:
>>> On 12/01/18 10:42, Ralph Böhme wrote:
>>>> Hey folks,
>>>>
>>>> more autobuild failures in flakey tests, afaict this one is new:
>>>>
>>>> UNEXPECTED(failure): samba.tests.samba_tool.visualize_drs.samba.tests.samba_tool.visualize_drs.SambaToolVisualizeDrsTest.test_reps(vampire_dc)
>>>>
>>>> The test was added in 00125edca2a9e27c5ddd46df8e2a499f8fc52b9e.
>>>>
>>>> We're not getting any autobuild throught at the moment because of so many flakey
>>>> test (unix.whoami, idmap.rfc2307, samba.blackbox.wbinfo, ...).
>>>>
>>>> Douglas, can you check what's wrong with the test? Thanks!.
>>>>
>>>> We may have to push a commit marking some of those tests as flakey to make
>>>> progress.
>>>>
>>>> -slow
>>>>
>>>
>>> Alas, there is probably another problem in that patchset. My current autobuild
>>> *should* be better. I am sorry.
>>
>> no prob!
>>
>> Just noticed that that patch isn't in master yet which I assumed but metze
>> included it in the autobuild patchset. metze removed them from the his and my
>> autobuild, which is a mirror of his and runs in parallel.
>>
>> Fwiw, I wonder why my mail didn't make it to the list, it's also not in the
>> archive. And this mail from Andrew
>> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-January/124940.html made it
>> to the archive but I never got it. Go figure...
> 
> Indeed the mailing lists seem broken today, just to add to the
> confusion and distress.
> 
> It would be good to get Douglas's patches into 4.8...

They reliable failed for me, so I removed them, sorry.

I retested the new patches from Douglas and included them again.

https://git.samba.org/?p=metze/samba-autobuild/.git;a=summary
runs twice currently as slow and metze.

Can someone give this a try in the catalyst cloud to check if
the samba4.blackbox.dbcheck(promoted_dc)(promoted_dc:local) test
works there?

Maybe also do some autobuilds with plain master as reference?

Thanks!
metze

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20180112/a162fe79/signature.sig>