New flakey test samba.tests.samba_tool.visualize_drs.SambaToolVisualizeDrsTest.test_reps

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 07:39 +0100, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 07:31:22PM +1300, Douglas Bagnall wrote:
> > On 12/01/18 10:42, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> > > Hey folks,
> > > 
> > > more autobuild failures in flakey tests, afaict this one is new:
> > > 
> > > UNEXPECTED(failure): samba.tests.samba_tool.visualize_drs.samba.tests.samba_tool.visualize_drs.SambaToolVisualizeDrsTest.test_reps(vampire_dc)
> > > 
> > > The test was added in 00125edca2a9e27c5ddd46df8e2a499f8fc52b9e.
> > > 
> > > We're not getting any autobuild throught at the moment because of so many flakey
> > > test (unix.whoami, idmap.rfc2307, samba.blackbox.wbinfo, ...).
> > > 
> > > Douglas, can you check what's wrong with the test? Thanks!.
> > > 
> > > We may have to push a commit marking some of those tests as flakey to make
> > > progress.
> > > 
> > > -slow
> > > 
> > 
> > Alas, there is probably another problem in that patchset. My current autobuild
> > *should* be better. I am sorry.
> 
> no prob!
> 
> Just noticed that that patch isn't in master yet which I assumed but metze
> included it in the autobuild patchset. metze removed them from the his and my
> autobuild, which is a mirror of his and runs in parallel.
> 
> Fwiw, I wonder why my mail didn't make it to the list, it's also not in the
> archive. And this mail from Andrew
> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2018-January/124940.html made it
> to the archive but I never got it. Go figure...

Indeed the mailing lists seem broken today, just to add to the
confusion and distress.

It would be good to get Douglas's patches into 4.8...

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett                       http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team  http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT          http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba