[PATCH] Update to the Samba crypto requirements document

[Björn JACKE]

On 2018-01-03 at 15:54 +0100 Volker Lendecke via samba-technical sent off:
> This says that glibc does not have a fallback to /dev/urandom if the
> syscall is not around. That means we have to implement the fallback
> ourselves in case we run with modern libc on an old kernel? Or shall
> we just abort then?

I think we should do the fallback in that case. It's not too unlikely that
people use the latest patch level of a random distro but have to stick to a
patch level 0 kernel because the latest kernel is not working. And we have to
have the fallback code anyway...

Björn
-- 
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de