[PATCH] Fix undefined behavior in NDR
Stefan Metzmacher
metze at samba.org
Wed Dec 5 21:32:17 UTC 2018
Hi Andreas,
> From 1dfc0522ee8bf173c6d02625cac7e0a5297b18f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andreas Schneider <asn at samba.org>
> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 15:15:03 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] librpc:ndr: Fix undefined behavior in ndr_basic
>
> librpc/ndr/ndr_basic.c:723:2: runtime error: null pointer passed as
> argument 2, which is declared to never be null
>
> The following triggered the undefined behavior:
>
> (gdb) bt
> at librpc/gen_ndr/ndr_drsuapi.c:2318
> fn=0x7ffff6e72983 <ndr_push_drsuapi_DsReplicaObjectIdentifier3Binary>) at ../../librpc/ndr/ndr.c:1337
> at ../../source4/dsdb/schema/schema_syntax.c:2136
> drs_str=<optimized out>) at ../../source4/dsdb/schema/tests/schema_syntax.c:122
> already_setup=<optimized out>, restricted=restricted at entry=0x0) at ../../lib/torture/torture.c:442
> at ../../lib/torture/torture.c:507
> suite=0x5555563d9490, matched=0x7fffffffcef7) at ../../source4/torture/smbtorture.c:93
> matched=0x7fffffffcef7) at ../../source4/torture/smbtorture.c:95
> at ../../source4/torture/smbtorture.c:143
> (gdb) f 1
> 1335 NDR_CHECK(ndr_push_bytes(ndr, blob.data, blob.length));
> (gdb) p blob
> $2 = {data = 0x0, length = 0}
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn at samba.org>
> ---
> librpc/ndr/ndr_basic.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/librpc/ndr/ndr_basic.c b/librpc/ndr/ndr_basic.c
> index c874f340388..b488c7c22d9 100644
> --- a/librpc/ndr/ndr_basic.c
> +++ b/librpc/ndr/ndr_basic.c
> @@ -719,6 +719,12 @@ _PUBLIC_ enum ndr_err_code ndr_pull_trailer_align(struct ndr_pull *ndr, size_t s
> */
> _PUBLIC_ enum ndr_err_code ndr_push_bytes(struct ndr_push *ndr, const uint8_t *data, uint32_t n)
> {
> + if (n == 0) {
> + return NDR_ERR_SUCCESS;
> + }
> + if (data == NULL) {
> + return NDR_ERR_INVALID_POINTER;
> + }
>
> NDR_PUSH_NEED_BYTES(ndr, n);
> memcpy(ndr->data + ndr->offset, data, n);
> ndr->offset += n;
> @@ -1329,6 +1335,10 @@ _PUBLIC_ enum ndr_err_code ndr_push_DATA_BLOB(struct ndr_push *ndr, int ndr_flag
> } else {
> NDR_CHECK(ndr_push_uint3264(ndr, NDR_SCALARS, blob.length));
> }
> + if (blob.length == 0) {
> + return NDR_ERR_SUCCESS;
> + }
> +
> NDR_CHECK(ndr_push_bytes(ndr, blob.data, blob.length));
> return NDR_ERR_SUCCESS;
> }
Why do we need this if we have checks in ndr_push_bytes()?
Adding the above two checks in ndr_push_bytes() might also be very
costly. Isn't the first check enough? It should also use unlikely()
metze
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20181205/9fadd311/signature.sig>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list