[PATCH] Add utilities to check style

[Simo]

On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 11:54 -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba-technical
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 02:49:02PM -0400, Simo wrote:
> > 
> > As I said README.Config contradicts itself, it says one thing but
> > points to an indent tool that does another.
> > 
> > So far You raised concerns about clarifying this rule in favor of what
> > the indent tool does, while Jeremy supported the opposite.
> > 
> > I am not married to either really, but I also prefer the { always on
> > the same line. I think we need to decide which way to go.
> > 
> > Anyone else has opinions ?
> 
> You know what they say about opinions :-). Yeah, I guess
> this is just a style thing - you and I like it one way,
> Ralph likes another. In those cases we should probably
> allow both IMHO.

Ok, I am going to strip any checking for parens then
because both == no stlye == no check we can enforce.

Attached find a patch with the check disabled (but the code is changed
to reflect my last proposal, so if we change mind at least we have the
code ready to be used).

Simo.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Add-utilities-to-check-style.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 21612 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20180426/5ea680e7/0001-Add-utilities-to-check-style.bin>