[PATCH] LMDB key value backend for ldb_tdb (to be renamed ldb_key_val)

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Wed Apr 4 20:23:50 UTC 2018


On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 16:47 +0200, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> > > However I will work today to see if anything can be pulled forward
> > > without upending the entire patch set.  It may be possible to bring
> > > some tests forward without the build hook for the lmdb mode, for
> > > example. 
> > 
> > I've spend my entire work day today re-ordering the patch set.  I hope
> > this is now satisfactory, as I can't put much more time into this.
> > 
> > Attached are two patches, one on top of the other patches sent today,
> > and one with all the LDB patches I'm trying to get merged.
> > 
> > Each patch compiles on its own and passes the ldb tests on its own.
> > 
> > If you could let me know that you are happy that I've addressed your
> > concerns as far as is practical that would be most appreciated. 
> > (Review comments also most welcome). 
> > 
> > The full CI results will be here:
> > https://gitlab.com/catalyst-samba/samba/pipelines/19933665
> > 
> > I've got one last patch ordering issue to work out with the
> > upgradeprovision.alpha13 test, but otherwise I do think this is good to
> > go.
> 
> Thanks! I'll have a closer look tomorrow.

I'll avoid sending a blow-by-blow update series but I've rebased this
on master (Andreas added a new test for ldb_qsort) and the whole set is
in this branch:

https://gitlab.com/catalyst-samba/samba/commits/abartlet-lmdb-reordered

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett                       http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team  http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT          http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba




More information about the samba-technical mailing list