[PATCH] LMDB key value backend for ldb_tdb (to be renamed ldb_key_val)
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
Wed Apr 4 20:23:50 UTC 2018
On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 16:47 +0200, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> > > However I will work today to see if anything can be pulled forward
> > > without upending the entire patch set. It may be possible to bring
> > > some tests forward without the build hook for the lmdb mode, for
> > > example.
> >
> > I've spend my entire work day today re-ordering the patch set. I hope
> > this is now satisfactory, as I can't put much more time into this.
> >
> > Attached are two patches, one on top of the other patches sent today,
> > and one with all the LDB patches I'm trying to get merged.
> >
> > Each patch compiles on its own and passes the ldb tests on its own.
> >
> > If you could let me know that you are happy that I've addressed your
> > concerns as far as is practical that would be most appreciated.
> > (Review comments also most welcome).
> >
> > The full CI results will be here:
> > https://gitlab.com/catalyst-samba/samba/pipelines/19933665
> >
> > I've got one last patch ordering issue to work out with the
> > upgradeprovision.alpha13 test, but otherwise I do think this is good to
> > go.
>
> Thanks! I'll have a closer look tomorrow.
I'll avoid sending a blow-by-blow update series but I've rebased this
on master (Andreas added a new test for ldb_qsort) and the whole set is
in this branch:
https://gitlab.com/catalyst-samba/samba/commits/abartlet-lmdb-reordered
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list