[PATCH] LMDB key value backend for ldb_tdb (to be renamed ldb_key_val)
abartlet at samba.org
Wed Apr 4 19:18:25 UTC 2018
On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 17:54 +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 06:57 +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > However I will work today to see if anything can be pulled forward
> > without upending the entire patch set. It may be possible to bring
> > some tests forward without the build hook for the lmdb mode, for
> > example.
> I've spend my entire work day today re-ordering the patch set. I hope
> this is now satisfactory, as I can't put much more time into this.
> Attached are two patches, one on top of the other patches sent today,
> and one with all the LDB patches I'm trying to get merged.
> Each patch compiles on its own and passes the ldb tests on its own.
> If you could let me know that you are happy that I've addressed your
> concerns as far as is practical that would be most appreciated.
> (Review comments also most welcome).
> The full CI results will be here:
Garming, this showed:
That is, a return to the imfamous 'failed to upgrade hash locks' on
TDB. Is this still something we get from time to time or should I look
into it more specifically?
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
More information about the samba-technical