[PATCH] LMDB key value backend for ldb_tdb (to be renamed ldb_key_val)

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Wed Apr 4 19:18:25 UTC 2018


On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 17:54 +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 06:57 +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > 
> > However I will work today to see if anything can be pulled forward
> > without upending the entire patch set.  It may be possible to bring
> > some tests forward without the build hook for the lmdb mode, for
> > example. 
> 
> I've spend my entire work day today re-ordering the patch set.  I hope
> this is now satisfactory, as I can't put much more time into this.
> 
> Attached are two patches, one on top of the other patches sent today,
> and one with all the LDB patches I'm trying to get merged.
> 
> Each patch compiles on its own and passes the ldb tests on its own.
> 
> If you could let me know that you are happy that I've addressed your
> concerns as far as is practical that would be most appreciated. 
> (Review comments also most welcome). 
> 
> The full CI results will be here:
> https://gitlab.com/catalyst-samba/samba/pipelines/19933665

Garming, this showed:
https://gitlab.com/catalyst-samba/samba/-/jobs/60989918

That is, a return to the imfamous 'failed to upgrade hash locks' on
TDB.  Is this still something we get from time to time or should I look
into it more specifically?

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett                       http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team  http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT          http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba




More information about the samba-technical mailing list