[PATCH] GUID index for LDB

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Fri Sep 8 19:35:49 UTC 2017

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:44 +0200, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> Can you also run an autobuild without the activation in Samba,
> so that we're sure we don't insert regressions for possible backports?

I have 7 successful runs and two failures:

[675(3927)/2196 at 1h21m53s] samba3.unix.whoami machine

UNEXPECTED(failure): idmap.rfc2307.Testing for expected group

I've seen both of those fail many times previously, therefore I'm happy
 that we don't introduce regresions for a backport.

The only masked test is dnscmd for wildcards, which is not in 4.7 and
needs fixing regardless.  There is also a fix for a record return order
assumption in the wildcard DNS early in the patch series. 

Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett                       http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team  http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT          http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba

More information about the samba-technical mailing list