Merge brlock.tdb and locking.tdb
jra at samba.org
Mon Oct 30 16:14:47 UTC 2017
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 08:39:02PM +0100, Volker Lendecke via samba-technical wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 06:25:54PM +0100, David Disseldorp via samba-technical wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 12:29:08 +0100, Ralph Böhme via samba-technical wrote:
> > > Unless I'm missing something, the record key is the same, we could add the brl data
> > > to the struct share_mode_data IDL definition and update the brlock code to use a
> > > different backing store.
> > >
> > > This consolidation could be helpful in the implementation of a persistent
> > > handles backing store.
> > >
> > > Anyone?
> > Sounds like a good idea to me.
> One argument for keeping brlock.tdb is the fact that we might have to
> read it MUCH more often to implement mandatory byte range
> locking. You don't want to parse a potentially large and complex
> locking.tdb record for every read or write request.
Yep, that's the issue. That's why the byte range lock
data was originally kept separate from the open file
More information about the samba-technical