socket_wrapper changes and ctdb

Andreas Schneider asn at
Wed Nov 22 06:44:57 UTC 2017

On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 06:06:48 CET Martin Schwenke wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:58:52 +1100, Amitay Isaacs via samba-technical
> <samba-technical at> wrote:
> > Wow.  Now it's a different failure. :-)
> > 
> > Here is the patch that fixes the test code.
> > 
> > It's surprising that the tests pass without the cwrap patches
> > (moving socket wrapper to third_party).  So something has
> > changed in the socket_wrapper code.
> Yeah, this is weird.  SIGKILL should put the process into zombie state
> and, if I understand correctly, all resources should be freed (except
> the process table entry).  It looks to be working like that without
> socket wrapper.  However, I don't see how socket wrapper could change
> that behaviour...  :-(
> If I get time (though not sure I will) I'll grab the socket wrapper
> tree and bisect between the versions to see what commit causes the
> change in behaviour:
> -VERSION="1.1.7"
> +VERSION="1.1.8"
> Extra effort in doing such a bisect is a price we pay for socket
> wrapper being developed out of tree...  :-(

Why? You just download the socket_wrapper git tree and bisect it there. That's 
how I do it.


Andreas Schneider                   GPG-ID: CC014E3D
Samba Team                             asn at

More information about the samba-technical mailing list