socket_wrapper changes and ctdb

[Martin Schwenke]

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:58:52 +1100, Amitay Isaacs via samba-technical
<samba-technical at lists.samba.org> wrote:

> Wow.  Now it's a different failure. :-)
> 
> Here is the patch that fixes the test code.
> 
> It's surprising that the tests pass without the cwrap patches
> (moving socket wrapper to third_party).  So something has
> changed in the socket_wrapper code.

Yeah, this is weird.  SIGKILL should put the process into zombie state
and, if I understand correctly, all resources should be freed (except
the process table entry).  It looks to be working like that without
socket wrapper.  However, I don't see how socket wrapper could change
that behaviour...  :-(

If I get time (though not sure I will) I'll grab the socket wrapper
tree and bisect between the versions to see what commit causes the
change in behaviour:

-VERSION="1.1.7"
+VERSION="1.1.8"

Extra effort in doing such a bisect is a price we pay for socket
wrapper being developed out of tree...  :-(

peace & happiness,
martin