The following change, or something like it, will go into Wireshark in a short while
realrichardsharpe at gmail.com
Fri Nov 10 09:32:43 UTC 2017
Yeah. I have had further discussion with people and a different concept
will likely be submitted.
It will likely be under the control of a preference and only if the server
On Nov 10, 2017 9:10 AM, "Volker Lendecke" <Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de>
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:17:44AM -0800, Richard Sharpe via
> samba-technical wrote:
> > We will be putting something like the following (see the screen shot)
> > change into Wireshark soon.
> > If you want me to tweak the wording, let me know.
> Please do that at a higher level. The initial SMB1 negotiate request
> is perfectly legitimate. In you screenshot, you can see that the
> server directly replies with a SMB2 packet. Please only print this
> message in case it's not the very first full SMB packet in the TCP
> SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
> phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
> AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
> http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
More information about the samba-technical