[WHATSNEW] Samba AD with MIT Kerberos + Version change
Alexander Bokovoy
ab at samba.org
Mon May 1 14:58:20 UTC 2017
On ma, 01 touko 2017, Rowland Penny via samba-technical wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 17:42:19 +0100
> Rowland Penny via samba-technical <samba-technical at lists.samba.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 09:30:21 -0700
> > Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 04:59:01PM +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> > > >
> > > > That's basically what I said, move to MIT instead of Heimdal and
> > > > change the version to 5 at the same time.
> > >
> > > Yes, we are in violent agreement :-).
> > >
> > > > How about putting something on the Samba webpage, it would make a
> > > > change from all the out of date info ;-)
> > >
> > > That's a really good idea !
> > >
> > > > The other question is, How do I use MIT instead of Heimdal on
> > > > debian ?
> > >
> > > I know you need MIT 1.15.1 which is the *very latest*
> > > release. Not sure if that's in debian yet (it's not
> > > in Ubuntu 17.04).
> >
> > OK, I will ask that question in a different way, what packages do you
> > need to install on Fedora to compile Samba as an AD DC using MIT ?
> >
> > Rowland
> >
>
> There seems to be a problem on debian stretch:
>
> ./configure --with-system-mitkrb5
>
> leads to this:
>
> Checking for kdb : yes
> Checking for gssapi : yes
> ERROR: MIT KRB5 build with Samba AD requires at least 1.15.1. 1.15 has been found and cannot be used
> ERROR: If you want to just build Samba FS use the option --without-ad-dc which requires version 1.9
> ERROR: You may try to build with embedded Heimdal Kerebros by not
> specifying --with-system-mitkrb5
>
> But when you check the installed package, you get this:
>
> dpkg -s libkrb5-dev
> Package: libkrb5-dev
> Status: install ok installed
> Priority: extra
> Section: libdevel
> Installed-Size: 173
> Maintainer: Sam Hartman <hartmans at debian.org>
> Architecture: amd64
> Source: krb5
> Version: 1.15-1
This is version 1.15, not 1.15.1.
> It would seem that 'Version: 1.15-1' isn't the same as the version that
> Samba AD requires, which is 'at least 1.15.1' ;-)
Yes, 1.15 is 1.15.0.
> To me it looks like Samba requires a dot between the package minor
> version and revision i.e. 15.1, but debian uses a dash '-' instead.
No, this is really an older version than required. A dash is for build
number, e.g. it is "1.15, Debian build 1".
--
/ Alexander Bokovoy
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list