[PATCHv2 1-14/14] Re: Disabling Python Modules

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 11:58 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 06/03/17 10:10 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > 
> > No problem.
> > 
> > FYI, I'm getting a conflict in lib/talloc/wscript , where it looks
> > like your patchset dropped the checks for the system copy of talloc
> > when it's not being build standalone -- is it OK to drop
> > this?  Gentoo
> > Linux in particular -always- builds samba against system talloc, I
> > expect other distros do the same..
> > 
> > Wouldn't tevent need a check that is similar to what was done in
> > lib/ldb/wscript?
> > 
> 
> Hey Andrew, speaking of lib/ldb , autobuild tests are returning an
> error related to a conflict in the ordering of the ldb and pyldb_util
> builds:
> 
> 
> Checking project rules ...
> Target 'pyldb-util.cpython-34m' in build group 'generators' depends
> on
> target 'ldb' from later build group 'main'
> Bad group ordering - aborting
> 
> 
> This doesn't look to have anything to do with the changes my
> disable-python patchset performs on top of your py3 patchset, but if
> i'm wrong please let me know.  My code is in my 'disable-python-py3'
> branch and the Travis-CI results are on PR#82

I got a full pass on my py3 branch overnight (a full autobuild), so I
think those are OK.

I don't know what is going on here right now.

Sorry, 

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett                       http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team  http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT          http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba