Releases, locking and ldb

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 08:07 +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba-technical
wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 18:11 +0200, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> > 
> > Would sssd break with these changes?
> > 
> > Do we have other known external users, beside openchange?
> 
> I'm not sure.  I'll check with apt reverse depends when I get to the
> office. 

For Debian:

libldb1
  Reverse Depends: ldb-tools (>= 2:1.1.27-1+b1)
  Reverse Depends: libldb-dev (= 2:1.1.27-1+b1)
  Reverse Depends: python-ldb (= 2:1.1.27-1+b1)
  Reverse Depends: python-samba (>= 2:4.5.8+dfsg-2)
  Reverse Depends: python-sss (>= 1.15.0-3)
  Reverse Depends: python3-sss (>= 1.15.0-3)
  Reverse Depends: samba (>= 2:4.5.8+dfsg-2)
  Reverse Depends: samba-dsdb-modules (>> 2:4.5.8+dfsg-2)
  Reverse Depends: samba-libs (>= 2:4.5.8+dfsg-2)
  Reverse Depends: samba-testsuite (>= 2:4.5.8+dfsg-2)
  Reverse Depends: sssd-ad-common (>= 1.15.0-3)
  Reverse Depends: sssd-common (>= 1.15.0-3)
  Reverse Depends: sssd-dbus (>= 1.15.0-3)
  Reverse Depends: sssd-proxy (>= 1.15.0-3)
  Reverse Depends: sssd-tools (>= 1.15.0-3)

That limits the fallout pretty well it seems.

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
Andrew Bartlett
https://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team         https://samba.org
Samba Development and Support, Catalyst IT   
https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba