[PATCH] Fix CID 1415704 Integer overflowed argument
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Thu Jul 27 16:25:46 UTC 2017
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 04:02:00PM +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> before we push any patch to Samba we should fix it in uid_wrapper first. The
> reason is that we want to avoid reverting patches when we update to a new
> version of uid_wrapper in Samba. So fixing it upstream first is important.
> Are you ok with the attached patchset? If yes I would push them to uid_wrapper
> upstream and then submit your patch for the Samba tree to autobuild.
My problem is that it can take really, really long until enough
patches have piled up to justify going through the wrapper release
process and then going through another round of review to finally get
the stuff into Samba. Having to wait many weeks to get a bugfix into
Samba stretches my patience a lot.
Also, if we did the right thing and not push the wrappers in one huge
blob patch but in individual patches to keep the proper history also
in Samba, we would not have a problem. The patches pushed to Samba in
advance would just be eliminated by a rebase because they already
exist. So if we followed good engineering practices, there would not
be any conflict at all.
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
More information about the samba-technical