[PATCH] vfs_shadow_copy2: document ordering requirement

Ralph Böhme slow at samba.org
Fri Feb 3 15:28:17 UTC 2017


Afaict the shadow_copy2 module should be put first in the module stack. Is this
correct? If yes, we should document this.

Can any of you folks who recently did more work on the module comment? Michael,
Jeremy, Uri?

-------------- next part --------------
From 52effe6955fecb8cfb728bd416c76fbb929ac311 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 16:19:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] vfs_shadow_copy2: document ordering requirement

For correct functionality this module should come before any other.

Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
 docs-xml/manpages/vfs_shadow_copy2.8.xml | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs-xml/manpages/vfs_shadow_copy2.8.xml b/docs-xml/manpages/vfs_shadow_copy2.8.xml
index ad69cff..9199f35 100644
--- a/docs-xml/manpages/vfs_shadow_copy2.8.xml
+++ b/docs-xml/manpages/vfs_shadow_copy2.8.xml
@@ -39,6 +39,10 @@
+	This module should be put at first place in the module list.
+	</para>
+	<para>
 	This is a second implementation of a shadow copy module
 	which has the following additional features (compared to the original

More information about the samba-technical mailing list