[RFC] [CTDB] Optimized memory handling.

[Swen Schillig]

On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 18:56 +1100, Amitay Isaacs via samba-technical
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Swen Schillig via samba-technical
> <samba-technical at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 14:53 -0500, jim via samba-technical wrote:
> > > You should not remove the error checks.
> > > The errors won't happen but that is no reason not to keep the
> > > checks.
> > > The code might change in the future.
> > 
> > I disagree, if a situation cannot happen, then there's no reason to
> > check for it. If things change in future, then this can too.
> > 
> 
> That's not correct.  As long as we are making any library calls (even
> though it's tevent), you cannot assume it will always succeed.
> 
> Amitay.
No, not always, but here I can because the only possibility for those
calls to fail is if there's no memory for a talloc...and that is cannot
happen.
But if you all insist, I can re-add.

Cheers Swen
>