Drop the implementation of CHECK_SRVIDS control
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Mon Aug 28 13:32:15 UTC 2017
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:13:56PM +1000, Amitay Isaacs wrote:
> Wouldn't it be easier to switch to using new control?
> What's the thinking behind wildcard srvid? I don't get it.
We have the SERVERID_UNIQUE_ID_NOT_TO_VERIFY in Samba. Sometimes we
explicitly do not want to check the unique id. We can of course do the
if-statement in Samba, doing process_exists or the new one based on
the serverid we are given. I just thought that for the new control
we'd have to throw an error anyway if the pid to check does not exist.
So I thought that with the SERVERID_UNIQUE_ID_NOT_TO_VERIFY we could
replace the old process_exists one. But if you prefer both separate
controls, I'm fine with that of too.
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
More information about the samba-technical