[PATCHES] Generate shorter name for extra python files
lslebodn at redhat.com
Tue Aug 15 12:22:58 UTC 2017
On (22/07/17 13:43), Andrew Bartlett via samba-technical wrote:
>On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 15:46 +0200, Stefan Metzmacher via samba-
>> Hi Lukas,
>> > > as this will take a bit to discuss, I'll prepare new talloc, tevent
>> > > and ldb releases without this.
>> > >
>> > > We need an ldb release for 4.7.0rc3 which is planed for next Tuesday.
>> > >
>> > I thought I answer all questions and Abrew wrote that:
>> > "(in that respect, I've not done a full review)"
>> > I am not sure how to move this forward. Or where is a problem.
>> > But I would really appreciate solution which works for upstream
>> > and all downstream debian, fedora ...
>> It's just time, some people are/will be on vacation, so it takes a bit
>> of time to have a solid solution.
>> We should not rush this into the release on Thursday. There will
>> be at least 1 or 2 rc's before 4.7.0.
>> But the most important thing is that we should not add a solution
>> to ldb-1.2.1, which we than have to revert for ldb-1.2.2.
>I agree, we need to get this right. Skipping it for rc3 should be
And we skipped rc4 as well. But I hope it is still possible
to get patches to final 4.7.0 :-)
>This area is complex, and I've been (rather unsuccessfully ;-) on leave
>for the past couple of weeks, and it need some serious thought, and I
>think the input of the original author to understand the original
>Then we need to publish the ABI files and binaries, then add a new
>function, re-publish and check it actually works, the new function is
>tagged with the new version, the old functions untagged in the ABI, the
>.so and then the thing debian uses to track those.
>That will give me the confidence we have got it right.
More information about the samba-technical