Process hierarchy on a DC?

[Stefan Metzmacher]

Am 29.04.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Ralph Böhme:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 01:11:30PM +0200, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
>> Am 28.04.2017 um 12:06 schrieb Ralph Böhme:
>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 02:39:21PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>>>> Much though I hate to revert, I think this might be a good case
>>>> for it temporarily.
>>>
>>> two patchsets attached:
>>>
>>> 1) revert the use of tfork in samba_runcmd_send(). This restores the process
>>> hierarchy and stopping samba by sending a single SIGTERM
>>
>> Please add a large explaination to the commit message, basically a summary
>> of this mail thread.
> 
> is this enough?

Yes, thanks!

I've pushed it to autobuild.

metze

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20170430/4de73c2a/signature.sig>