[PATCH] vfs_shadow_copy2: document ordering requirement

[Michael Adam]

On 2017-02-03 at 16:28 +0100, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Afaict the shadow_copy2 module should be put first in the module stack. Is this
> correct? If yes, we should document this.
> 
> Can any of you folks who recently did more work on the module comment? Michael,
> Jeremy, Uri?

That seems about right.
Thinking some more whether anything might need to go before
shadow_copy2...

Cheers - Michael


> From 52effe6955fecb8cfb728bd416c76fbb929ac311 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 16:19:26 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] vfs_shadow_copy2: document ordering requirement
> 
> For correct functionality this module should come before any other.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org>
> ---
>  docs-xml/manpages/vfs_shadow_copy2.8.xml | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/docs-xml/manpages/vfs_shadow_copy2.8.xml b/docs-xml/manpages/vfs_shadow_copy2.8.xml
> index ad69cff..9199f35 100644
> --- a/docs-xml/manpages/vfs_shadow_copy2.8.xml
> +++ b/docs-xml/manpages/vfs_shadow_copy2.8.xml
> @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@
>  	</para>
>  
>  	<para>
> +	This module should be put at first place in the module list.
> +	</para>
> +
> +	<para>
>  	This is a second implementation of a shadow copy module
>  	which has the following additional features (compared to the original
>  	<citerefentry><refentrytitle>shadow_copy</refentrytitle>
> -- 
> 2.9.3
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20170426/89862ace/signature.sig>