delayed network interfaces and ctdb service startup

Steve French smfrench at gmail.com
Thu Sep 8 17:09:49 UTC 2016


patch makes sense - will try it.

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:06:45 +1000, Amitay Isaacs <amitay at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Steve French <smfrench at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I am not convinced it is network related after all, may have misread
>> > one of the logs e.g.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2016/08/31 21:01:32.549360 [ 3623]: CTDB starting on node
>> > 2016/08/31 21:01:32.549697 [ 3623]: Recovery lock file set to "".
>> > Disabling recovery lock checking
>> > 2016/08/31 21:01:32.556948 [ 3666]: Starting CTDBD (Version
>> > 4.4.6-UNKNOWN) as PID: 3666
>> > 2016/08/31 21:01:32.557023 [ 3666]: Created PID file /run/ctdb/ctdbd.pid
>> > 2016/08/31 21:01:32.557040 [ 3666]: Set real-time scheduler priority
>> > 2016/08/31 21:01:32.557138 [ 3666]: Set runstate to INIT (1)
>> > 2016/08/31 21:01:32.557605 [ 3666]: Set event helper to
>> > "/usr/libexec/ctdb/ctdb_event_helper"
>> > 2016/08/31 21:01:35.951911 [ 3666]: libust[4475/4475]: Error: Timed
>> > out waiting for lttng-sessiond (in lttng_ust_init() at
>> > lttng-ust-comm.c:1532)
>> > 2016/09/01 02:09:10.002215 [ 3666]: No event for 18453 seconds!
>> > 2016/09/01 02:09:10.002240 [ 3666]: libust[4698/4698]: Error: Timed
>> > out waiting for lttng-sessiond (in lttng_ust_init() at
>> > lttng-ust-comm.c:1532)
>> > 2016/09/01 02:09:10.002277 [ 3666]: Event script '05.system init '
>> > timed out after 18454.0s, pid: 4698
>> > 2016/09/01 02:09:10.002463 [ 3666]: ../ctdb/server/eventscript.c:912
>> > eventscript for 'init' timedout. Immediately banning ourself for 300
>> > seconds
>> > 2016/09/01 02:09:10.002478 [ 3666]: ctdb exiting with error: Failed to
>> > run init event
>> >
>> >
>> Looks like system time jumped  Or was there really no event for 5+ hours?
>> May be we need additional dependency on time-sync.target as well as
>> network-online.target.
>
> How about the attached patch then?  :-)
>
> peace & happiness,
> martin



-- 
Thanks,

Steve



More information about the samba-technical mailing list