[PATCHES] wider use of torture_comment in some torture tests

[Uri Simchoni]

On 09/06/2016 06:27 PM, Günther Deschner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> please review and push.
> 
> Guenther
> 

It looks like the last hunk in [3/10] belongs in [5/10] - depends on
torture_smb2_createfile being public. Well, it wasn't getting built so
maybe that's not so bad...

Beside the use of torture_comment(), many of the changes are naming
convention changes, torture->tctx. 8/10 is purely torture->tctx. So
maybe that needs to be in the commit message.

Other than that, RB+ me.

Thanks,
Uri.