Is multi-channel feature stable enough?

[Michael Adam]

On 2016-10-13 at 12:59 +0000, Youzhong Yang wrote:
> Thanks Jeremy.
> 
> I filed a bug report with the description copy-pasted from your reply:
> 
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12376

I closed this as a duplicate of

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11897

Cheers - Michael


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:jra at samba.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 8:20 PM
> To: Youzhong Yang <Youzhong.Yang at mathworks.com>
> Cc: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: Is multi-channel feature stable enough?
> 
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 07:53:11PM +0000, Youzhong Yang wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'd like to ask a quick question: since multi-channel has been in 4.4 release for quite a while, I am just wondering if it is considered stable and can be used in production environment.
> 
> As I recall there's still an outstanding issue with a connection being dropped after a break has been sent - break needs to be resent on other channels. I think that's the only one though.
> 
> We might want to log a bug to track this.
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20161016/760f8968/signature.sig>