Race condition in tdb_runtime_check_for_robust_mutexes()
Uri Simchoni
uri at samba.org
Tue Mar 29 10:43:08 UTC 2016
On 03/29/2016 01:41 PM, Ralph Boehme wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 01:22:35PM +0300, Uri Simchoni wrote:
>> On 03/29/2016 01:03 PM, Uri Simchoni wrote:
>>> On 03/29/2016 12:52 PM, Uri Simchoni wrote:
>>>> Pushed with my RB+
>>>
>>> ..once again with the removed unused status :)
>>>
>>>
>> OK this is becoming embarrassing.
>>
>> Please review the attached - jumping to cleanup_m instead of cleanup_ma
>> after pthread_sigmask().
>
> thanks for spotting this! Pushed.
>
> I was already seriously considering adding a second patch that changes
> the cleanup logic to use state flags instead of gotos, eg
>
> bool cleanup_mutex = false;
>
> ret = pthread_mutex_init(...);
> if (ret != 0) {
> goto cleanup;
> }
> cleanup_mutex = true;
>
> ...
>
> cleanup:
> if (cleanup_mutex) {
> ...cleanup mutex...
> }
>
> Cheerio!
> -slow
>
Seems like the thing we should do, considering the empirical evidence...
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list