[PATCHES] avoid memory errors with ldb client cookies

[Douglas Bagnall]

On 18/03/16 22:33, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 03:53:22PM +1300, Douglas Bagnall wrote:
> 
>> The second patch checks if the same talloc_memdup()s fail in mundane ways.
> 
> Doesn't that require a ldb_oom in the failure cases?

This one should be better. Thanks for noticing that Volker.

Douglas

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-ldb-client-controls-don-t-ignore-failed-memdup.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1682 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20160322/87a94174/0001-ldb-client-controls-don-t-ignore-failed-memdup.diff>