[PATCHES] avoid memory errors with ldb client cookies

[Douglas Bagnall]

hi Volker,

Thank you for the review.

On 18/03/16 22:33, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 03:53:22PM +1300, Douglas Bagnall wrote:
> 
>> The second patch checks if the same talloc_memdup()s fail in mundane ways.
> 
> Doesn't that require a ldb_oom in the failure cases?

Aha. Sounds likely. I will look into it next week.

thanks

Douglas