[PATCHES] avoid memory errors with ldb client cookies
douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz
Fri Mar 18 20:22:26 UTC 2016
Thank you for the review.
On 18/03/16 22:33, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 03:53:22PM +1300, Douglas Bagnall wrote:
>> The second patch checks if the same talloc_memdup()s fail in mundane ways.
> Doesn't that require a ldb_oom in the failure cases?
Aha. Sounds likely. I will look into it next week.
More information about the samba-technical