Does any MS document clarify the behavior when a parent allows DELETE CHILD on an object but the object has a DENY DELETE
jra at samba.org
Wed Jun 15 20:58:34 UTC 2016
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:17:08PM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Uri Simchoni <uri at samba.org> wrote:
> > On 06/15/2016 09:29 PM, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> >> Hi folks,
> >> A quick look at MS-DTYP does not clarify this question for me.
> >> What is the actual behavior when you have a directory, D, with an
> >> object O in it, and the DACL on D allows DETELE_CHILD for user U but O
> >> has a DENY DELETE ACE for user U in its DACL?
> > MS-FSA 126.96.36.199.2.1 details this. My interpretation (haven't tested
> > against a Windows machine) is that delete is granted if either the
> > file's DACL grants DELETE or the parent grants DELETE_CHILD (by "grants"
> > I mean "allows and not denies"), i.e. that it will be allowed.
> Thanks. I guess I should have looked at MS-FSA.
> This appears to be the sentence:
> If (Open.RemainingDesiredAccess.MAXIMUM_ALLOWED ||
> Open.RemainingDesiredAccess.DELETE), the object store MUST set
> Open.GrantedAccess.DELETE if AccessCheck(SecurityContext,
> Open.Link.ParentFile.SecurityDescriptor, FILE_DELETE_CHILD) returns
Yes, DELETE_CHILD can override a DENY DELETE ACE.
More information about the samba-technical