[PATCH] Two attempts in fixing default ACL in vfs_acl_xattr
abartlet at samba.org
Tue Jul 19 10:24:20 UTC 2016
On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 10:17 +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 06:17:39PM +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 18:46 +0200, Ralph Boehme wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > For files or directories without an ACL xattr we build an ACL
> > > from
> > > the
> > > filesytem mode including user, group and other ACE, plus an ACE
> > > for
> > > system.
> > > Review and comments appreciated. If ok, please don't push yet,
> > > I'd
> > > like to create a bugreport first and add the bug link to the
> > > commit
> > > messages.
> > G'Day,
> > Is there any way this can be tested in our posixacls.py test?
> where is posixacls.py? git grep pretedens to now know about it.
Sorry for the confusion.
BTW, the background is that I didn't like not having a good test for
the NT -> POSIX ACL mappings when I was doing the merge to use smbd as
the fileserver in the AD DC, so I came up with a way to test this
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
More information about the samba-technical