smbd/source3 or ntvfs/source4 for new VFS module development?
repenny241155 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 27 15:50:08 UTC 2016
On 27/01/16 14:56, Ira Cooper wrote:
> Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> writes:
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:46:31PM -0800, Zack M. Davis wrote:
>>> Dear list,
>>> When developing a new VFS module, does it still make sense to put it in
>>> source3/modules/vfs in the source repository and use the `smb_register_vfs`
>>> API as illustrated in examples/VFS/skel_*.c? Or is it preferrable to use
>>> the source4/ntvfs infastructure (which is newer, but ominously described as
>> source4/ntvfs is dead. It's legacy code, that will eventually be
> When is eventually?
> Cheers, with pitchforks and torches,
How about sometime last week :-D
More information about the samba-technical