smbd/source3 or ntvfs/source4 for new VFS module development?
ira at wakeful.net
Wed Jan 27 14:56:22 UTC 2016
Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:46:31PM -0800, Zack M. Davis wrote:
>> Dear list,
>> When developing a new VFS module, does it still make sense to put it in
>> source3/modules/vfs in the source repository and use the `smb_register_vfs`
>> API as illustrated in examples/VFS/skel_*.c? Or is it preferrable to use
>> the source4/ntvfs infastructure (which is newer, but ominously described as
> source4/ntvfs is dead. It's legacy code, that will eventually be
When is eventually?
Cheers, with pitchforks and torches,
More information about the samba-technical