[PATCH] Reintroduce support for RPC modules

[Ralph Boehme]

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 02:52:57PM +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Friday 19 February 2016 14:36:08 Ralph Boehme wrote:
> > Hi Andreas,
> > 
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 02:27:02PM +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > > On Friday 19 February 2016 13:39:47 Ralph Boehme wrote:
> > > > As mentioned in the tevent-glib-glue thread, I have a small patchset
> > > > that reintroduces the possibilty to build RPC services as modules.
> > > 
> > > with building modules we had a lot of problems in the past. We have some
> > > code you can't build as a module, even if you can specify them as a
> > > module.
> > not sure you noticed the fact that this patchset actually only adds
> > support for one specific module.
> > 
> > > I'm sorry but I don't want to have this **** again while packaging. There
> > > is only one option.
> > 
> > Nothing to worry about actually, as long as you don't build with
> > --enable-spotlight *and* --with-shared-modules=rpc_mdssvc_module.
> > 
> > So I don't really understand your problem with this.
> 
> This is how it always starts and in the end we end up with a mess again.
> 
> It is *only* one module and then 10 and then nobody are about loading them as 
> a module anymore and then from 10, 8 of then only work if linked statically.

I see your point.

> We had this in the past and it ended always like that. That's simply why I 
> don't like it. I'm fine if *all* RPC services are compiled and loaded as a 
> module.

Converting all doesn't make sense, because as metze pointed out in
anothe thread, the whole thing likely going to change in the near
future anyway.

Thanks!
-Ralph

-- 
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de,mailto:kontakt@sernet.de