[PATCH] Address another obvious memory leak in loadparm.

[Jeremy Allison]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:22:09AM +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 February 2016 08:47:43 Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:18:09AM +0000, Hemanth Thummala wrote:
> > > I have attached the patch which has the fix for this
> > > problem. Please let me know if the patch looks good.
> > 
> > Yes, the patch looks very good, thanks! I haven't run a private autobuild
> > with that yet. Does that survive?
> > 
> > Attached find two cosmetic changes. Feel free to squash them.
> > 
> > Also, your change triggers the question -- do we have a proper talloc
> > hierarchy for "struct loadparm_service"? If so, couldn't we avoid the
> > special handling in free_service()?
> 
> We also need to backport this, so please open a bug report and add it to the 
> commit message. Check "git log v4-4-test" for the format ...

Bug was already logged and added to the commit message:

BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11740

Patch (and extra cleanups) LGTM. Pushing after local
autobuild test.