[PATCH] URI RR Support for resolv_wrapper

[Nathaniel McCallum]

On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 16:12 +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Thursday, 18 August 2016 09:26:11 CEST Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 07:55 +0200, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 09:45:27 CEST Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:33:15PM -0400, Nathaniel McCallum
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > One thing to note is that we have to #define ns_t_uri since
> > > > > glibc
> > > > > doesn't yet provide it. However, I made a patch for that too:
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-08/msg00465.html
> > > > > 
> > > > > Specifically, our desire for this patch is to test the
> > > > > upstream
> > > > > URI
> > > > > record usage that will be hopefully going into MIT Kerberos:
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://github.com/krb5/krb5/pull/481
> > > > 
> > > > The code looks fine to me and seems to work fine, too (as long
> > > > as
> > > > the
> > > > unit tests are concerned).
> > > > 
> > > > LGTM
> > > 
> > > +1
> > > 
> > > Thanks for your contribution.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I've pushed it upstream.
> > 
> > Thanks! Any idea when we might see this feature in a release?
> 
> How fast do you need it?
> 
> I would do a new release as soon as we have support for PTR records
> too. Jakub 
> would implement that. I don't know when he finds time for it.

Well, we actively want URI record support for a MIT krb5 patch
currently nearing completion. So, our preference is sooner rather than
later.

Nathaniel