autobuild failure due to python replication tests - why ?

Ira Cooper ira at wakeful.net
Wed Aug 3 05:49:07 UTC 2016


On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:33 AM, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 16:37 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 05:13:34PM +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 19:47 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 07:32:03PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Then the replication tests and ctdb tests NEED TO BE REMOVED
> > > > > NOW !
> > > >
> > > > Apologies. Error EIAMTOOMUCHOFANASSHOLE :-).
> > > >
> > > > That was a little too strong. However I hope you understand
> > > > my frustrations with this, we really do need to get a fix
> > > > for this sooner (this week ?) rather than later. This week
> > > > please ?
> > > >
> > > > In the meantime I'll resubmit, but that can't be the long
> > > > term solution.
> > >
> > > I'm running tests to see if
> > > reverting 055544321389de5d5cea8e129e0923369e9f558b or
> > > e0b6d6bb10479759905932ea5438fc57713f0a8f helps, as this got much
> > > worse
> > > just as we forked for 4.5, which is where this commit was.
> > >
> > > It may simply be that we don't correctly notice the new schema, or
> > > the
> > > need for new schema to replicate schema.
> >
> > Unfortunately the autobuild failed again. That's 3 times in a row.
> > I'm sorry but these replication tests have completely broken
> > development on Samba, and we can't continue with this.
>
> Did you try with the tests referenced by those commits skipped, or with
> those patches reverted?
>
> Andrew Bartlett
>
> --
> Andrew Bartlett                       http://samba.org/~abartlet/
> Authentication Developer, Samba Team  http://samba.org
> Samba Developer, Catalyst IT
> http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
>
>
>
What are your results Andrew.

0/3 here, with autobuilds on sn... I'm not a happy camper.

Cheers,

-Ira


More information about the samba-technical mailing list