Enabling profiling globally ...

Ralph Boehme slow at samba.org
Thu Apr 7 14:38:05 UTC 2016


On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 07:19:38AM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:34 AM, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 04:59:32PM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Richard Sharpe
> >> <realrichardsharpe at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> that put it in your smb.conf. Cf man smb.conf, this is an existing
> >> >> parameter.
> >> >>
> >> >> This seems so obvious that I'm suspecting that I miss something
> >> >> here...
> >> >
> >> > Actually, there is one additional thing I would like to be able to do,
> >> > and that is have this switched on dynamically when the smb.conf
> >> > changes.
> >> >
> >> > Currently it is only checked/change when the smbd starts.
> >>
> >> It turns out I was asking the wrong question.
> >>
> >> What I really want is profiling on a per-share basis so I can figure
> >> out which shares to co-locate on the same nodes in a cluster and so
> >> forth based on which ones are getting more or less ops.
> >
> > I have some dated wip patches that do just that afair. Attached, feel
> > free to munge and make something usable out of it. They don't apply to
> > master, but should be easy to massage them so they do.
> >
> > The main problem is, that the stats aggregation becomes expensive with
> > many users and shares.
> 
> Thanks. I haven't looked at them yet, but was thinking along the lines
> of separate shared segments per share.

Shared segments of what? :) Note that the profiling code doesn't use
sysv shared memory anymore, but a tdb.

> However, that becomes expensive
> if the customer wants thousands of shares (and I have heard of that,
> although most of them seem to be fake shares of the sort you get when
> you dynamically create a share per user for their home directory, for
> example.)

if you only have care about shares I think it's okay. It gets
expensive if you enable per user *and* per share profiling, because
then the aggregation has O(user*share) performance.

Cheerio!
-slow



More information about the samba-technical mailing list